Due process does not preclude the use of interim measures to protect complainants.
In the many false accusation horror stories, schools make findings of fact which are incorrect and which they are unqualified to judge in the first place. This is not the same as the entirely sensible thought that perhaps a school should temporarily remove …
Due process does not preclude the use of interim measures to protect complainants.
In the many false accusation horror stories, schools make findings of fact which are incorrect and which they are unqualified to judge in the first place. This is not the same as the entirely sensible thought that perhaps a school should temporarily remove a student from contact with others (without rendering any sort of verdict) while a legal process plays out.
Due process does not preclude the use of interim measures to protect complainants.
In the many false accusation horror stories, schools make findings of fact which are incorrect and which they are unqualified to judge in the first place. This is not the same as the entirely sensible thought that perhaps a school should temporarily remove a student from contact with others (without rendering any sort of verdict) while a legal process plays out.