It can simultaneously be true that al-Gharbi's takes on the Middle Eastern conflicts are misguided or worse, and that he has something useful to offer on the class politics of 21st century America.
Hell, Chomsky's writing on both post-modernism's failures and the limits of large language models still stand strong, even though his foreign policy takes are even worse.
It can simultaneously be true that al-Gharbi's takes on the Middle Eastern conflicts are misguided or worse, and that he has something useful to offer on the class politics of 21st century America.
Hell, Chomsky's writing on both post-modernism's failures and the limits of large language models still stand strong, even though his foreign policy takes are even worse.
This exactly. I absolutely donтАЩt agree with a lot of what he claims but I appreciated the thoughtful discussion and there were a few lightbulb moments in the ep too.
It can simultaneously be true that al-Gharbi's takes on the Middle Eastern conflicts are misguided or worse, and that he has something useful to offer on the class politics of 21st century America.
Hell, Chomsky's writing on both post-modernism's failures and the limits of large language models still stand strong, even though his foreign policy takes are even worse.
100% agree.
This exactly. I absolutely donтАЩt agree with a lot of what he claims but I appreciated the thoughtful discussion and there were a few lightbulb moments in the ep too.